Home · Journal · Google Ads
Google Ads17 min read03/08/2026

Google Ads costs by industry: Cluj vs Florence, 2026

Florence searches for hotels eleven times more than Cluj — and bids less per click. We pulled the real auction data for both cities out of Google Keyword Planner, put two accounts we manage next to it, and found the assumption most budgets are built on is backwards.

A phone on a wooden desk showing the Google Ads logo on screen
Every figure here carries its source. Two of the sources are our own accounts.
In brief

The finding. More demand does not mean a pricier click. Florence has eleven times the search volume Cluj has for hotels, and its bid ceiling is a third lower.

What we measured. Auction ranges and search volumes for five industries in both cities (Google Keyword Planner, July 2025 – June 2026), Google's own budget forecasts, and two accounts we manage — with the dashboards.

The numbers to keep. Our Romanian account pays 0.52 lei a click (about €0.10); the Italian one €0.15. Both sit under the European median of €0.45, and a long way under the $5.42 US average that scares everyone.

  • Five industries side by side, with 4–5 real queries and their bid ranges each.
  • Why competition, not demand, sets the price of a click.
  • Google's forecast against two real invoices.
  • What to watch after the click — you have about ten seconds.

Here is the number that made us write this. In Google Keyword Planner, „hotel firenze" averages 40,500 searches a month and a top-of-page bid ceiling of €1.31. „hotel cluj" averages 3,600 searches — eleven times fewer — and a ceiling of 9.05 lei, about €1.81.

A city with a tenth of the demand charges nearly 40% more for the same click. Whatever you assumed about small markets being cheap to advertise in, the auction disagrees.

We have run Google Ads since 2011, back when it was still AdWords, and we manage accounts in both countries. So we did the obvious thing: exported the auction data for five industries in both cities, and put our own invoices next to it. Everything below is that export.

What a bid ceiling actually is

Definition: the „top of page bid" range in Keyword Planner is what advertisers have historically bid to appear above the organic results — the low and high end of what was actually paid for the top slots.

It is not your cost per click. It is the ceiling of the fight. Our own accounts pay well under the ceilings of their industries, because what you actually pay depends on the quality of the ad and the landing page, on targeting, and on the bidding strategy. Read the ceiling as „how expensive can this get", not „what this will cost me".

Two more things Keyword Planner hands you, both used below: the average monthly search volume (a twelve-month mean, rounded into steps by Google) and a competition label — Low, Medium, High — which counts advertisers bidding, not SEO difficulty.

Five industries, Cluj against Florence

We picked the generic query for each industry — no hotel names, no trattoria names, which otherwise dominate the lists — and pulled volume plus auction range for the twelve months to June 2026. Florence is the comparison because it is a local market of comparable size with strong tourism. The queries are not identical between markets: each market types differently, and we let it.

01 · Bid ceiling, by industry

In Cluj, a garage click costs more than a hotel click

The high end of the top-of-page bid range, in euros, across five industries. Press the second button for Italy.

€2.77priciest: auto & service, Cluj
€1.81lodging and restaurants, Cluj
TOP-OF-PAGE BID, IN € — LOWER IS CHEAPER0€1€2€31.81Lodging1.81Restaurants0.35Rural tourism2.77Auto & service0.51Beauty

In Cluj, garages bid highest — 13.85 lei a click, about €2.77 — ahead of lodging and restaurants at roughly €1.81. Cabins stay at €0.35.

Google Keyword Planner, July 2025 – June 2026 · benchmark queries listed in the tables below · rate ~5 lei/€

Benchmark queries and their full auction ranges
IndustryCluj (query · range)Italy (query · range)
Lodginghotel cluj · 1.27–9.05 leihotel firenze · €0.35–1.31
Restaurantsrestaurante cluj · 0.84–9.06 leiristorante firenze · €0.23–1.06
Rural tourismcabana cluj · 0.26–1.76 leiagriturismo toscana · €0.10–0.68
Auto & serviceservice auto cluj · 2.42–13.85 leirevisione auto firenze · €0.49–1.56
Beautycoafor cluj · 1.00–2.56 leiparrucchiere firenze · €0.24–0.77
Same five industries in both states; gold follows auto & service, the Cluj auction champion.
Cittago chart on black: average monthly search volume by industry — hotel cluj 3,600 against hotel firenze 40,500, eleven times more; restaurante cluj 12,100 against ristorante firenze 18,100; cabana cluj 1,000 against agriturismo toscana 12,100; service auto cluj 1,600 against revisione auto firenze 390; coafor cluj 880 against parrucchiere firenze 2,900
Gold is Cluj. Volumes are twelve-month monthly averages, rounded into steps by Google.
Demand does not raise the price of a click. Competition does. Florence searches for hotels eleven times more than Cluj — and bids lower ceilings.

Lodging

The headline pair, and the one worth staring at: 3,600 searches and a 9.05 lei ceiling in Cluj, against 40,500 searches and €1.31 in Florence. Keyword Planner gives us the fact, not the reason. What we see in the market: in Cluj a handful of ad slots are contested by hotels, booking platforms and aggregators all at once; in Florence the inventory is enormous and the auction thins out.

Lodging: expensive and cheap queries, both markets
MarketQuerySearches/moBid range
Clujcazare cluj napoca5,4001.09–12.47 lei
Clujcazare cluj6,6000.93–9.66 lei
Clujhotel cluj3,6001.27–9.05 lei
Clujpensiuni cluj2,9000.87–5.08 lei
Clujcazare ieftina cluj („cheap")3900.59–7.72 lei
Florencehotel firenze40,500€0.35–1.31
Florencealbergo firenze12,100€0.35–1.54
Florencehotel firenze economici1,900€0.26–0.91

Note the pattern in that table, because it repeats everywhere: the query with the most precise intent bids highest, and the word „cheap" in a query does not buy a cheap click — 7.72 lei at the ceiling for „cazare ieftina cluj". People hunting for a bargain are still customers, and advertisers know it.

Restaurants

The largest local demand in our set — „restaurante cluj", 12,100 searches a month, competition marked Low — and yet the ceiling reaches 9.06 lei. Plenty of demand, few bidders, but the ones bidding do it hard. For a restaurant starting out with ads that is good news: you enter cheap and have room to climb.

Restaurants: from terraces to pizzerias
MarketQuerySearches/moBid range
Clujrestaurant cluj6,6000.93–12.51 lei
Clujrestaurante cluj12,1000.84–9.06 lei
Clujpizzerii cluj napoca1701.85–6.14 lei
Clujterasa cluj (terrace)8800.69–1.19 lei
Florenceristorante firenze18,100€0.23–1.06
Florencepizzeria firenze8,100€0.24–0.80
Florencetrattoria firenze5,400€0.23–0.61

Rural tourism

The cheapest clicks in both countries. Everything cabin-related in Cluj sits under 2 lei, and Tuscan agritourism stays under €0.70 — even though „agriturismo toscana" pulls 12,100 searches a month at High competition. Best ratio of interest to cost in the whole set.

Rural tourism: cabins and agritourism
MarketQuerySearches/moBid range
Clujcabana cluj1,0000.26–1.76 lei
Clujcabane de inchiriat cluj7200.23–1.34 lei
Clujcabane apuseni4800.49–1.85 lei
Tuscanyagriturismo toscana12,100€0.10–0.68
Tuscanyagriturismo toscana con piscina6,600€0.15–0.62
Tuscanyagriturismo arezzo3,600€0.19–2.83

Auto & service — the expensive chapter

„service auto cluj" — 1,600 searches a month, ceiling 13.85 lei, above hotels. And when urgency meets a legal obligation, the auction detonates: „statii itp cluj" (vehicle inspection stations) runs 8.27 to 77.60 lei a click — the most expensive click in this entire article — and mobile tyre service open around the clock reaches 24.89 lei. „Non stop" is, literally, a price multiplier.

The perfect control sits in the same industry: „spalatorie auto cluj" (car wash) has exactly the same volume as the garage query — 1,600 searches — and a ceiling of just 3.05 lei. Same car, different wallet: a wash costs 30 lei, a repair costs thousands. A click is expensive in proportion to the customer behind it.

Auto & service: urgency has a price
MarketQuerySearches/moBid range
Clujstatii itp cluj (inspection)1708.27–77.60 lei
Clujvulcanizare mobila cluj non stop1101.59–24.89 lei
Clujservice auto cluj1,6002.42–13.85 lei
Clujspalatorie auto cluj (car wash)1,6001.16–3.05 lei
Florencecentro revisione firenze210€0.49–1.76
Florencerevisione auto firenze390€0.49–1.56

Why is the Italian inspection so calm at €1.56? It is a periodic, regulated service at a price fixed by the state — nobody makes much from one inspection, so nobody bids hard. Romanian vehicle inspection lives in another auction universe because garages orbit it, selling the repairs the inspection uncovers.

Beauty

A volume business, not an auction business, in both cities: everything under 4 lei and under €0.80. Worth noting that „frizerii cluj" (barbershops) has nearly double the searches of „coafor cluj" (hairdressers) — the vocabulary of the market has moved, and ads bidding on the older word miss half the demand.

Beauty: high volume, cheap clicks
MarketQuerySearches/moBid range
Clujsalon cosmetica cluj901.00–3.63 lei
Clujcoafor cluj (hairdresser)8801.00–2.56 lei
Clujfrizerii cluj (barbershops)1,6000.99–2.15 lei
Florenceparrucchiere firenze2,900€0.24–0.77
Florencebarbiere firenze880€0.17–0.38

Two footnotes for collectors. „dentista firenze" bids €1.18–5.70 — the priciest Italian query in our set; expensive medical services bid expensively everywhere. And our favourite: „google ads firenze", with all of 30 searches a month, carries a ceiling of €8.40. The click about clicks is among the dearest of all.

The whole ladder, for scale

Cittago chart on black: average cost per click from five sources — $5.42 US average, €0.45 European median, €0.18 Google's estimate for Romania, €0.15 our managed account in Italy and €0.10 our managed account in Romania
The barely visible bars are not a design error. That is the real ratio between the number that frightens people and the number that gets paid here.

The left-hand bar is what you find first when you search in English: $5.42 per click, the average in WordStream's May 2026 report across 13,474 search campaigns. Serious numbers, and exclusively American — the report says so itself: „US-based search advertising campaigns".

For Europe there is a running measurement at Smarter Ecommerce, an Austrian campaign-software vendor: across €650 million in spend, the median as of 3 August 2026 was €0.45 per click in Search. Against the American figure, our Romanian account pays roughly a fiftieth; the Italian one, roughly a thirtieth.

Google's forecast against two invoices

On 3 August we ran the Keyword Planner forecast on our own account for September 2026, on a small budget: 50 lei a day in Romania, €10 a day in Italy. Google's projection: an average click of 0.92 lei (~€0.18) and €0.13 respectively.

And here is what actually got paid, in two accounts we manage — one in Romania, one in Italy, completely different industries, same month: June 2026. We do not publish client names; the aggregate figures, exactly as Google's dashboard rounds them, say enough.

Google Ads dashboard for the managed Romanian account, June 2026: 5.23 thousand clicks, average cost per click 0.52 lei, 445.68 conversions and 2.7 thousand lei spent, with the month's daily chart below
The Romanian account, June 2026, as Google displays it: 5.23K clicks, CPC 0.52 lei, cost 2.7K lei. Tap the image to enlarge.
Google Ads dashboard for the managed Italian account, June 2026: 4.53 thousand clicks, average cost per click 0.15 euros, 92 conversions and 671 euros spent across 44 campaigns
The Italian account, same month: 4.53K clicks, CPC shown as €0.15 (€671 ÷ 4,530 = €0.148 exactly), cost €671. Tap to enlarge.
02 · CPC — Google's forecast against real accounts

Romania paid 43% below Google's forecast

Same two markets, two sources: the Keyword Planner forecast for September, and two managed accounts in June. Press the second button for the accounts.

€0.18forecast CPC, Romania
€0.13forecast CPC, Italy
COST PER CLICK, IN EUROS — LOWER IS CHEAPER00.050.100.150.200.18Romania — 0.92 lei0.13Italy

On a budget of 50 lei a day in Romania and €10 a day in Italy, Google forecasts an average click of 0.92 lei and €0.13 respectively, for September 2026.

Forecast: Google Keyword Planner, Cittago account, exported 3 August 2026 · Actual: two managed accounts, June 2026 · rate ~5 lei/€

Forecast and reality, side by side
SourceMarketCPCContext
Keyword Planner, Sept 2026 forecastRomania0.92 lei (~€0.18)50 lei/day, 31,832 forecast impressions
Keyword Planner, Sept 2026 forecastItaly€0.13€10/day, 49,355 forecast impressions
Managed account, June 2026Romania0.52 lei (~€0.10)5,230 real clicks
Managed account, June 2026Italy€0.15 shown (€0.148 exact)4,530 real clicks
The buttons change the source, not the scale. The axis stays 0–€0.20 throughout.

Two honest caveats. The forecast is for September and the accounts are from June — this is a lineup of reference points, not a controlled test. And the conversions in those two accounts are not comparable: each counts something different, a WhatsApp message in one, a submitted form in the other. Cost per click compares cleanly; conversions do not.

One more number out of the forecast, the one everybody skips: of the impressions projected for Romania, 81% are on a phone. In Italy, 84%.

Cittago chart on black: forecast impressions by device — Romania 81.2% mobile, 18.2% desktop, 0.6% tablet; Italy 83.6% mobile, 15.2% desktop, 1.2% tablet
These are forecast shares for our own account rather than an industry average — but both markets say the same thing.

After the click: the first ten seconds

The click you paid for is only half the journey. The other half plays out on your page, in a window shorter than most people assume.

Nielsen Norman Group measured it back in 2011: users leave pages in 10–20 seconds, and to hold them longer the page must communicate its value proposition within 10 seconds. Your headline and subhead carry that proposition. Survive the first ten seconds and the curve flattens — anyone past 30 seconds often stays for minutes.

Now lay page speed over that window. Google and SOASTA measured in 2017, across hundreds of thousands of landing pages: as load time goes from 1 to 3 seconds, the probability of a bounce rises 32%; at 5 seconds, 90%; at 10 seconds, 123%. And more than half of mobile visits abandon pages that take over 3 seconds (Google, 2016).

The arithmetic of the window

If your page loads in 5 seconds on a phone, you have burned half of the ~10-second window in which the visitor decides — and the probability they leave has already risen 90%. Your headline no longer has 10 seconds to convince. It has 5.

Which is why behaviour metrics deserve the same attention as CPC:

  • Bounce rate. In GA4 a bounce is an unengaged session: under 10 seconds, no conversion, no second page. A high bounce on paid traffic rarely means „uninterested people" — more often it means a slow page, a technical fault, or a page promising something the ad did not.
  • Time on page, as a trend. Rising month over month means the content genuinely improved. Falling means something broke: the copy, the speed, or the relevance of the ad bringing people in. The direction matters more than the absolute number.
  • Separating the traffic. None of this is readable if paid traffic mixes with organic. Google Ads links to GA4 through auto-tagging (the GCLID parameter added to every click); Meta campaigns get tagged manually with UTM parameters. Only then can you compare organic bounce against paid bounce on the same page — and if paid does much worse, the mismatch is between ad and page, not the page itself.

Why we look at the site before touching the campaign

Part of what a click costs is not decided in the auction at all — it is decided on your site. Google scores the landing page experience, and weak pages pay more for the same slot. With 8 in 10 impressions on a phone, „your page" almost always means your page on a phone.

That is why campaigns are not a separate department here. We are a small studio in Cluj covering the whole chain: design and branding, web development, load speed, persuasive copy, mobile optimisation, email marketing with automations, forms and lead capture, dedicated campaign pages with autoresponders, discount coupons, cross-network remarketing between Google and Meta, brand awareness campaigns. Measurement gets wired through four tools we fit on every project:

  • Google Tag Manager — the box that lets you add and remove any measurement script without touching the site's code.
  • Google Analytics 4 — what people do after the click: what they read, where they give up, what they send.
  • Meta Pixel — connects Facebook and Instagram ads to on-site actions, so remarketing has something to stand on.
  • Hotjar — heatmaps and anonymous recordings: where people stall on a page, and why.

We list them not to sell anything here, but because every figure in this article passed through those layers — and because when you take over managing a Google Ads account, half the work turns out to be outside the account.

What these numbers do not say

The limits, stated before anyone states them for us
What it showsWhat you cannot conclude
Keyword Planner bid ceilingsThat this is what you will pay. They are historic top-slot extremes — our accounts pay well below them.
Search volumesExact figures. Google rounds them into steps (1,000; 3,600; 12,100) and reports twelve-month averages, so seasonality disappears.
The September forecastThat you will get it. Forecasts are projections on a given budget, not guarantees.
Conversions in our screenshotsCross-account comparisons. Each account defines conversion differently, which is why we compare cost per click only.
Two managed accountsA market benchmark. Two accounts, two industries — real reference points, not an average for Romania or Italy.
The behaviour studies quotedTimeless figures. Nielsen measured in 2011, Google/SOASTA in 2017 — the mechanisms hold, the exact percentages have an age.

Terms, briefly

The words that come up in every conversation about ad costs
TermWhat it means
CPCCost per click — what you pay when someone taps the ad, whatever they do next.
Top of page bidThe historic bid range for slots above the organic results. The market's ceiling, not your invoice.
Average monthly searchesHow many searches a query gets in a typical month, as a twelve-month mean, rounded by Google.
Competition (in Keyword Planner)How many advertisers bid on the query: Low, Medium, High. It describes ads, not SEO difficulty.
ForecastGoogle's projection for a given budget: clicks, impressions, average cost. A flight plan, not a ticket.
CPACost per conversion — a form sent, a call made. The figure that actually matters, and the only one no public benchmark carries.
Bounce rate (GA4)The share of unengaged sessions: under 10 seconds, no conversion, no second page. A thermometer for ad-to-page fit.
Engaged sessionA visit lasting over 10 seconds, or producing a conversion, or seeing at least two pages. The opposite of a bounce.
GCLID & UTMThe tags that record where a click came from: GCLID is added automatically by Google Ads, UTMs are added by hand elsewhere. Without them, paid and organic mix irreversibly.
Value propositionThe promise in your headline and subhead: what the visitor gets by staying. It has about 10 seconds — minus load time.

Where you are, in three thresholds

  1. You are not running ads yet. Do not start from the campaign, start from the figures: the forecast for your industry and city tells you in advance whether the budget makes sense. That is exactly what we hand over free in the box below.
  2. You are running but not measuring conversions. Stop for a week and wire up measurement — without it, „going well" only means „the budget is being spent". Then compare your CPC against the reference points here.
  3. You run and you measure. Then the right comparison is not your CPC against anyone's average, but your cost per conversion this month against last. The figures here only tell you whether the market is taxing you abnormally.

If you want our eyes on your numbers, Google Ads management is precisely what we have done since 2011.

Questions clients ask — and a few they should

How much does a Google Ads click cost in Cluj?

It depends on the industry far more than the city. From the real auction data for July 2025 – June 2026: cabins 0.26–1.76 lei, barbershops 0.99–2.15, hairdressers 1.00–2.56, hotels 1.27–9.05, garages 2.42–13.85 — and vehicle inspection stations up to 77.60 lei.

Those are ceilings for the top slots, not what you pay on average: the Romanian account we manage paid 0.52 lei per click in June 2026.

Why does Cluj bid higher than Florence for hotels?

Keyword Planner gives the fact, not the reason: a 9.05 lei (~€1.81) ceiling for „hotel cluj" against €1.31 for „hotel firenze", even though Florence has eleven times the volume — 40,500 searches against 3,600.

The likely explanation is competition over scarce inventory: in Cluj the same handful of slots are contested by hotels, booking platforms and aggregators. The practical takeaway matters more than the explanation: do not assume a small city means cheap clicks.

Is the „top of page bid" what I will actually pay?

No. It is the range advertisers have historically bid for slots above the organic results — the market's ceiling, not your invoice. What you pay depends on ad and landing-page quality, targeting, and bidding strategy.

The proof from our accounts: the real average paid (0.52 lei in Romania, €0.15 in Italy) sits under the ceilings of those industries.

Why do costs vary so much between industries?

Because the auction is not on „Cluj", it is on each individual query, and the price is set by whoever bids on it. A garage click is worth a lot — the repair is urgent and expensive — so it gets bid aggressively.

The cleanest example is inside one industry: „spalatorie auto cluj" (car wash) has the same search volume as „service auto cluj" but a ceiling four times lower. Same car, different wallet.

What is a realistic starting budget?

Our forecast used 50 lei a day (about €300 a month), for which Google projects roughly 1,600 clicks at 0.92 lei each. That is a reasonable start for a local service with a cheap click.

In an expensive industry — garages, inspection, round-the-clock tyre service — the same budget buys a fraction of that, so the threshold at which the campaign produces useful data is higher. Our rule: the minimum budget is the one that buys at least a few hundred clicks a month. Below that you learn nothing.

My campaign has a high bounce rate. Is the ad bad?

Not necessarily the ad. In GA4, a bounce is a session under 10 seconds with no conversion and no second page — and the frequent causes, in order, are: the page loads slowly (at 5 seconds of load time the probability of leaving has already risen 90% against 1 second, per the 2017 Google/SOASTA research), the page promises something different from the ad, or a technical fault you cannot see from your desktop.

The quick test: compare paid bounce against organic bounce on the same page. If organic is fine and paid is not, the mismatch is between ad and page.

Are these figures useful outside Romania and Italy?

The specific numbers, no — auctions are local. The mechanisms travel: demand does not set the price, competition does; the more valuable and more urgent the customer, the pricier the click; the word „cheap" inside a query does not buy a cheap click.

Run the same export for your own city in Keyword Planner and you will see the same shapes with different figures.

How do I choose a Google Ads agency?

Ask for three things, all verifiable in ten minutes. The Google Ads account must be yours — you own it, the agency gets access, and if you part ways the campaigns and history stay with you. A monthly report stating what a lead cost, not how many impressions you had. And a contract you can exit on short notice without penalties.

Whoever refuses any of the three is telling you exactly how the relationship will go.

Is it better to rank organically or pay for ads?

It depends on how fast you need customers. Ads bring traffic on day one and stop the day the budget stops; organic takes months and stays. For a small business the usual combination is ads on the immediate commercial terms and content on the questions people ask before buying.

The figures here help with the paid side: if the click in your industry is cheap — cabins, beauty — ads are almost certainly the first profitable move.

How do I get the exact figures for my own industry?

From Google Keyword Planner, with an active Google Ads account: enter your queries and you get volume and bid range. If you have no account or no appetite for it, use the box in this article — we send the same export free, in one email.

Method and sources

So all of it is checkable, the full chain: bid ranges and volumes come from Google Keyword Planner, Cittago account, „Keyword Stats" exports dated 3 August 2026, twelve-month averages for July 2025 – June 2026, generic queries only (brand terms removed by hand). Cost estimates are the forecast exports from the same day for September 2026, on budgets of 50 lei/day (Romania) and €10/day (Italy). Account screenshots come from two accounts we manage, June 2026, with no client identifying data; Google's dashboard rounds the figures it displays. External benchmarks: WordStream, „Google Ads Benchmarks 2026", May 2026, 13,474 search campaigns, US only; Smarter Ecommerce Market Observer, 3 August 2026, median across €650M of European e-commerce spend. Behaviour research: Nielsen Norman Group, „How Long Do Users Stay on Web Pages?", Jakob Nielsen, 2011; Google/SOASTA mobile speed research published on Think with Google, February 2017; the 53% abandonment figure above 3 seconds: Google, 2016. Currency conversions use ~5 lei/€. What is not in this article: invented figures, „market" averages without a stated sample, or client data published without anonymisation.

Last updated: 3 August 2026. We refresh these figures monthly; whatever changes stays written here.

What clients say

Trusted by the people who signed the checks.

5.0★★★★★21 reviews on Google
★★★★★
We have been collaborating for over 11 years on both presentation web sites and complex projects. We have always returned to the services offered by Cittago, thanks to the professionalism, courtesy and innovative solutions offered. Thanks for your partnership!
Aurelia Campean2 years ago
★★★★★
I am very satisfied with the collaboration with Cittago. Everything went in a professional manner, the deadlines were met, and the result was as expected. I highly recommend!
Cristea Christian4 days ago
★★★★★
5* for the quality of service, promptness and seriousness. Thank you, Paul!
Budurlean Crina5 days ago
★★★★★
We had the cabins and the view, but Cittago gave us the perfect digital “reception”. They created a premium, ultra-fast website for us that handles everything on its own: live calendar, automatic invoicing and card payments (only 1% commission instead of 15–20% on platforms). The best part? We edit it ourselves in a few minutes, without depending on anyone. And Paul is simply unreal for this world! The warmth, respect and attention to detail with which he explains absolutely everything make you understand the services offered perfectly. Not to be missed is the availability that Paul shows when you have a question. Honestly, I have rarely dealt with such a professional and dedicated company.
Viorica Pop5 days ago
★★★★★
Serious and fast team. They built our BarBox website from scratch, with a cinematic look that represents us perfectly, plus local SEO so people in Cluj can find us. Simple communication, zero hassle. 5 well-deserved stars.
tudor j6 days ago
★★★★★
I had the pleasure of working with Cittago for the creation of a website for a project that I develope together with some friends, and I couldn't be happier with the results. From start to finish, they demonstrated exceptional professionalism, creativity, and technical expertise. First and foremost, the communication throughout the project was outstanding. They took the time to listen to our ideas and goals, and they translated them into a visually stunning and highly functional website that perfectly represents our product. We were kept in the loop at every stage of development, and they was always quick to address any questions or concerns I had. What sets Cittago apart is their dedication to delivering results. They went above and beyond to ensure that our website met all our requirements and objectives. They even provided valuable suggestions and insights that improved the overall project. I wholeheartedly recommend Cittago to anyone looking for a digital agency that combines creativity, technical expertise, and exceptional customer service. Thank you Paul for a job well done!
Bochiş Răzvan2 years ago
★★★★★
Thank you Paul for all the professionalism you show, for all the patience and all the help you give me. I highly recommend!
Daniela Pasc2 years ago
★★★★★
The collaboration I have had since the beginning, that is, for several years, with Cittago is a real pleasure! I turned to Paul to rebuild the website of a small dental clinic and I am extremely satisfied with the collaboration. Paul is still taking care of the website. The promptness with which he responds to me, the patience with which he explains everything I don't understand (and there are many, believe me 😂🙈), his maximum involvement and desire to give his best have always helped me and given me a lot of confidence in him. He is always there when I need him. Very professional! And the quality-price ratio is unbeatable. I recommend Paul with confidence, if you want someone who really puts his heart into what he does and gives his best!
Daniela Chis2 years ago
★★★★★
I have had the pleasure of working with Paul and Cittago on several websites. From the initial discussion to the launch of the website, I was impressed by their professionalism, expertise, and dedication to creating an exceptional product to launch online that we can all be proud of. Paul took the time to truly understand what I wanted, what my brand meant, what my target audience was, and what my goals were. Using his knowledge, he was able to create a user-friendly, visually beautiful, responsive (on both mobile and desktop) website that communicates the services and products we offer very well. The website not only looks great, but it works just as well. Throughout the process, Paul was receptive to feedback, and patiently answered all the requests I had. We appreciated his vast knowledge (about website creation, SEO, social media connection, visual experience), his expertise in applying it, his patience, transparency, and his ability to successfully complete such a project, which was very important to us. For these reasons, I highly recommend this company and the services it offers.
Aissa Suciu2 years ago
·First paint — when something appeared·Server response — before anything could load·Page ready — when you could interactSpeed details